Friday, 31 May 2013

The signs ignored by Sweden and the ringing bell in Greece and Europe

Is Greece becoming the "test tube" of a "European Islamic spring"? Violence on a daily basis is now what is happening in Sweden from the Islamists "immigrants" , who decided to rage against Sweden beneficial to them because a 69 year old Muslim was "murdered" by the police.

Because all seem to have as a starting point, a "murder" (so they decided themselves the "immigrants", ignoring the laws of the State which hosts them and give them everything in the name of multiculturalism and support for weak people) and because it seems that there is a certain "uprising pattern" (do not forget that the events in France had similar a occasion, like the violent episodes in Athens, in 2008 - the murder of the young Alexis by the police or the subsequent episodes of Muslims because of a "torn and trampled "Koran, according to testimony of an Islamist" immigrant"), it will be Europe, and Greece, to take fully into account the "phenomenon of rebellion"and the pretexts by which this "phenomenon" appears.

In the Swedish case, however, there were serious of tangible clues that seemed to increase awareness of how "immigrants" respect the country that accepted them and hosts them and the laws that govern it. But the political and journalistic world of Sweden, chose the path of silence, tolerance, and ultimately their complicity in what is now affecting the image of Sweden.

They chose to hide the visible problem, the provocative attitude of "immigrants." They chose to "dress" with a false image of their own country, they chose to hide delinquency and crimes of "immigrants" against native Swedish population. They chose to embrace multiculturalism, knowing that it was a deadly embrace and-simultaneously-deep insult to existing victims of "immigrants", the Swedish citizens.
So, they wanted to ignore the Swedish authorities that Sweden has a negative record to be the second country in the world to rape women after South Africa and six times more over-proportionally to its population-from the USA. And perhaps it is no coincidence that rapes are by Islamic "immigrants" ...

More specifically, the index of women rape  per 100,000 inhabitants was 9.24 in 2003, in 2005 the index jumped to 36.8 in 2008 and rose to 53.2.

According to statistics 1 in 4 women in Sweden fell or will fall victims of rape. The reason for this sudden increase in rapes is the significant influx of immigrants in the country and 77% of solving rapes are committed by Muslim immigrants, while Muslims do not exceed 5% of the general population.
Main field of the rapes are the urban centers. Last summer in Stockholm the rate of rapes ranged in 5 per day!

The population of Sweden increased from 9 to 9.5 million, between 2004 and 2012 mainly by immigrants from Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia.
The "signs" were there. But no one responded beeing afraid to be classified-by the "politically correct" - as racist. So the fanatic Islamists, who have shown that they do not respect any law of the host state, but accept, follow and try to impose their own Islamic understanding of sociality, today are attacking the country that benefited them, reminding the dog that bites the hand that is feeding it. These signs are evident in other European countries, and this is precisely why the general alarm that currently exists in the old continent.

Statistics Islamist prisoners in relation to the percentage of the population in countries of Europe

Spain: Muslims constitute 70% of total prisoners, but only 2.3% of the country's inhabitants
France: Muslims constitute 66% of the prisoners, but only 7.5% of the country's inhabitants
Switzerland: Muslims constitute 58% of the prisoners, but only 5.7% of the country's inhabitants
Norway: Muslims constitute 30% of the prisoners, but only 3% of the country's inhabitants
Netherlands: Muslims constitute 26% of the prisoners, but only 5.5% of the country's inhabitants
Belgium: Muslims constitute 20% of the prisoners, but only 6% of the country's inhabitants
Italy: Muslims constitute 18% of the prisoners, but only 2.6% of the country's inhabitants
UK: Muslims constitute 12.6% of prisoners, but only 4.6% of the country's inhabitants.

The Greek "case" 

In Greece, of course, things are very different and studies refer to population change after two decades, since the growth of "immigrants" (by continuing their entry, and increased births) leads mathematically Greece in to the Muslim world ...
However, if we consider that it is regular of Islam to claim forcibly the reception  and tolerance area when a critical mass is created, then Greece may be close to a phenomenon of a particular effect "Islamic Explosion"an "Islamic Spring" in a country of Europe. Besides, before hazarding such a venture in more "western" countries, Greece seems to meet all the requirements for an "interesting" experiment of validity and enforcement of Islam against the infidels of the West ...

We live on the verge of maximum developments-paradoxically-not counting uncertain factors such as the tendency of Islam to cover territories by force. If we consider the geopolitical battle given, the case of a - potential disposal of Islam becoming a dominant force in the new order, should not be considered dismissed.If this happens, ie if we lose control and fail to operate the mullahs puppets of the West, then we'll talk about a huge conflict. Moreover, Arab analysts referring to what is happening in Syria talk about "religious war", specifying it so far as feud between Sunnis and Shiites and "deleting" (oddly enough, as analysts) the genocide of Christians in the Middle East and North Africa .

In view of developments, if we want to act correctly and wisely as a country, we need to be prepared for the worst, and this is because they are not in our front door, but in ... our house

Εxpecting, any developments, we focus on both the decisions of the Swedish government, and of the Greek (proconsul) government of Antonis Samaras, which is "dying" and may decide to "raise" or and support through-existent retentions risks in a desperate attempt to stay in power.


PS: We should not ignore the very serious potential of supporting the events (military murders, fires, collisions and vandalism in Sweden) by the "guard" politicians who want a quick change in Europe-and of course-in the footsteps of Boston in the making of control conditions of European citizens, through decisions to protect them against Islamic terrorism ...

Europe is changing for the worse and soon we will see policies derogations that will attempt to reduce the political and human rights of European citizens in the name of combating Islamic terrorism. Τhe "danger"may have been created and some decided to trigger their "useful idiots" trough Islam.



Tuesday, 21 May 2013

Albrecht Ritschl: Germany is the champion in war debts

Albrecht Ritsch

Germany had occasionally international preeminence in many sectors: tourism, exports, arts, football. But where is permanently unrivaled  is in the sport of "borrow and return nothing." "Germany is world champion in war debts" reiterated recently the Professor of Economic History Albrecht Ritschl. So far has not paid a dime for its debts during the Second World War. These include the so-called forced loan to the Bank of Greece, the height of which, at current prices is estimated at several billion euros. Thus the expressed will of the Greek government to formally request the repayment of the loan causes headaches in Berlin.  
Government spokesman Steffen Seibert constantly declares that "there is no subject for discussion" βut everyone knows that claims are ahead and that will bring in a strong test the Greek-German relations.

Michael Slecht

The opinions on the reception of such a (Greek) request from the German government are divided. "If Greece requests by legal means its claims, the German government will accept it" supports the spokesperson of the parliamentary party Left (Die Linke) supports the parliamentary party spokesperson Left (Inter LINK) Michael Slecht.

Just opposite is the opinion of Mr. Ritschl ιn the following interview. Α "yes" to Greece, he says, would force Germany to pay reparations to other countries - victims of the second world war. But this is ruled out. This allows the Germans to remain world champions in unpaid debts.

interview to NIKOS CHEILAS

Manolis Glezos asked Wolfgang Schäuble to discuss with the Greek government the issue of German war debts. Do you think that he will?

Ι would be surprised if he did. This would mean that Germany would abandon the far proven tactics of denial. Just a few days ago also Schäuble described the raising of the issue a distraction from the main current problems.

To what, could Greece hope, if the necessary negotiations took place?

The honest answer is, i am afraid, to nothing. Germany will not accept debate, because if it starts it is not going to stop - soon will come claims from other countries. The view of Helmut Kohl that prevailed generally after the reunification of Germany was that it is impossible to "sell" the reparations to the German population and that if this was done would cause as after the First World War, more harm than good. The best for him was the continuation of the economic and political cooperation in Europe.

The German historian Götz Aly places the occupation loan in the general war debts of the defeated country. Is this correct?

In Article E ʹof the Treaty of London from 1953 it was determined that the Second World War debts of Germany - including the occupation loan - and the reparations will be dealt at a conference after the German reunification. The so called 2 + 4 pact between the two German states and the four victorious powers of  in 1990 says nothing about debts and reparations. From this stems the legal view of Germany that everything is solved since.

Were there forced loans by other occupied countries?

Given the aggressiveness of the Third Reich foreign policy, the question that must be asked is: was ever given voluntarily loans to the Nazis from occupied countries?

Götz Aly also argues that much of the war reparations come from the gold of the Jews of Thessaloniki. Do the descendants have claims on this gold?

The looting of gold and especially that of the Jews had been assigned to special German units. For Thessaloniki, I do not know exactly the issue. But generally I know that the Nazi regime was charged the expenditures for the extermination of Jews to their home countries. One such example is the transport of τηε French Jews to Auschwitz that was charged to the French State. After the war, however, Germany, without recognizing its debt to reparations, paid individual compensation through state organizations and institutions.

How can the reparations be calculated ? Only by the winners of the war, or in collaboration with the losers?

Such remedies have been since antiquity a counterweight of the losses of the winners. The decisive case in Germany was the decision of the allies prematurely to terminate the process of reparations and to put in place the cooperation of European countries with Germany. Having eliminated the burden of reparations and debts, the economy and the currency became so healthy and Germany became an export country. By doing so, Germany, brought forth surpluses in Europe, not through the coercive street of reparations but through the accumulation of surpluses in foreign trade and the creation of large property abroad. This season we are experiencing -among other- the depreciation of an important part of this property.


Several German politicians warn against the German and the Greek debts becoming entangled. Why not netted them?

Politically this netting between Greece and Germany is already done. Economically we must say that the current health of Germany is not random but indirect result of the policies of the coalition forces after the great war. German surpluses would have been unthinkable without the netting.

Would part of the German elite consider a Greek claim as causus belli (cause of war);

I have not met anyone yet who would send paratroopers in Crete, if you mean something like this. The mood in Germany is currently rather defensive and isolationist, not aggressive. If it were possible to cut Germany with a large saw from the European continent and to moor as an island somewhere between Australia and the Chinese sea, perhaps the majority of Germans would say "yes". No one is interested anymore for imperialist adventures, although many overseas see it differently. The German public has a rather anti-militarist stance.

Could the European agenda be changed due to claims from Athens?

Not necessarily. Ιn Germany there is a growing trend against the euro due to the perception that the common currency has broken the countries of Europe and has made us obnoxious to other Europeans.

Could the Greek claims bring appetite to other countries robbed by the Nazis?

Doubtless. For this reason also Berlin excludes any discussion on the subject. Greece will not be the exception here. The effects of such claims will undoubtedly come up rather indirectly. On the other hand, of course, this could have unintended consequences such as the strengthening of a current that says it is better to give up the euro and lose part of the value of our assets abroad than becoming the target of a new hatred of other peoples.

source: "TO VIMA" newspaper April 28th 2013


Albrecht Ritschl: "If Germany paid war compensations, would go bankrupt immediately”